Wikisage, the free encyclopedia of the second generation, is digital heritage

User talk:Selfie City

From Wikisage
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hello Selfie City, most welcome to the English-language Wikisage!
Wikisage is a free encyclopedia, to which everyone can contribute. We are looking forward to your input.
Information about the use of Wikisage can a.o. be found through the portals Help, Community and Wikisage. If you have any questions, you can always visit the helpdesk.
Each user has a personal talk page, like this one. If someone writes here, you are alerted by an orange bar. Each article has a talk page as well. Sign your messages on talk pages and discussion pages like the helpdesk by putting four tildes ~. Your username and the time of writing will then be added automatically. You can also use the second button from the right above the editing window.
There is a waiting time of 48 hours before you can start editing. You also need to confirm your email address first (see 'my preferences').

Guido den Broeder (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2019 (CET)

Yes, I noticed that at first about the waiting time, but it's OK, I figured it out. Thanks! --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 18:41, 24 February 2019 (CET)


It is hard to understand I donot know when exists today such a Wiki I visit proper site but I dont see much did?--Penarc (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2019 (CEST)

Penarc Sorry if I'm not understanding, but is your point that Citizendium doesn't seem to be as active as you'd expect? See RationalWiki:Citizendium, which explains the project's editing decline over the past few years. In short, it has been a long, gradual decline since Larry Sanger left the project. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 04:06, 6 June 2019 (CEST)


Where you say wikipedia I would like "some--Penarc (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2019 (CEST)body"(anyone. Various sources and so on) and in line a reference (as you know WP edit Many unidentified people) user:penarc,

OK, could you show me what you'd like to see so I can do it the way you'd like it? Thanks. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 23:03, 8 June 2019 (CEST)
I saw the following problem with commons, it is a repository, and it is unstable many my pic were deleted (some reasonable other no, second wikiPedia also changes but citing a precise edit is more traceable --Penarc (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2019 (CEST)
In Commons, would page archives work? --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:25, 12 June 2019 (CEST)
By the way, I've gone through the edits you made to Ancient Rome and thank you for doing this. What I'll try to do in future, is: when I use Wikipedia as a source, I'll also include the source that WP used (whenever possible). --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:47, 12 June 2019 (CEST)

reliable source

Wp is a reliable source if you cite the version are you using. I said my student on Botany-speech what time you visit/access Wp because I change latter.

Primary sources are better than WP, many lecturer do not access essays citing Wp.

Wikidata is a good opportunity to delete Wp init. Always attribution as 1st edition is a good practice¡ --Penarc (talk) 16:56, 12 June 2019 (CEST)

I see, I’ll do my best in future to cite the version, as you say, rather than just a link. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:48, 13 June 2019 (CEST)