Wikisage, the free encyclopedia of the second generation, is digital heritage
User talk:Selfie City: Difference between revisions
(→what template: new section) |
Selfie City (talk | contribs) (→what template: reply) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== what template == | == what template == | ||
<nowiki>{{reflist}}</nowiki> is compact, otherwise I use <references/> when a pair of ''references'' are needed --[[User:Penarc|Penarc]] ([[User talk:Penarc|talk]]) 00:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | <nowiki>{{reflist}}</nowiki> is compact, otherwise I use <nowiki><references/></nowiki> when a pair of ''references'' are needed --[[User:Penarc|Penarc]] ([[User talk:Penarc|talk]]) 00:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Okay, thanks! I'll keep that in mind in future. --[[User:Selfie City|SelfieCity]] ([[User talk:Selfie City|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Special:Contributions/Selfie City|contributions]]) 16:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:11, 10 May 2020
|
Guido den Broeder (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2019 (CET)
- Yes, I noticed that at first about the waiting time, but it's OK, I figured it out. Thanks! --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 18:41, 24 February 2019 (CET)
citizendium
It is hard to understand I donot know when exists today such a Wiki I visit proper site but I dont see much did?--Penarc (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2019 (CEST)
- Penarc Sorry if I'm not understanding, but is your point that Citizendium doesn't seem to be as active as you'd expect? See RationalWiki:Citizendium, which explains the project's editing decline over the past few years. In short, it has been a long, gradual decline since Larry Sanger left the project. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 04:06, 6 June 2019 (CEST)
Rome
Where you say wikipedia I would like "some--Penarc (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2019 (CEST)body"(anyone. Various sources and so on) and in line a reference (as you know WP edit Many unidentified people) user:penarc,
- OK, could you show me what you'd like to see so I can do it the way you'd like it? Thanks. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 23:03, 8 June 2019 (CEST)
- I saw the following problem with commons, it is a repository, and it is unstable many my pic were deleted (some reasonable other no https://commons.miraheze.org/wiki/File:44-Wikied_commons.jpg), second wikiPedia also changes but citing a precise edit is more traceable --Penarc (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2019 (CEST)
- In Commons, would page archives work? --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:25, 12 June 2019 (CEST)
- By the way, I've gone through the edits you made to Ancient Rome and thank you for doing this. What I'll try to do in future, is: when I use Wikipedia as a source, I'll also include the source that WP used (whenever possible). --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:47, 12 June 2019 (CEST)
- In Commons, would page archives work? --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:25, 12 June 2019 (CEST)
reliable source
Wp is a reliable source if you cite the version are you using. I said my student on Botany-speech what time you visit/access Wp because I change latter.
Primary sources are better than WP, many lecturer do not access essays citing Wp.
Wikidata is a good opportunity to delete Wp init. Always attribution as 1st edition is a good practice¡ --Penarc (talk) 16:56, 12 June 2019 (CEST)
- I see, I’ll do my best in future to cite the version, as you say, rather than just a link. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 00:48, 13 June 2019 (CEST)
what template
{{reflist}} is compact, otherwise I use <references/> when a pair of references are needed --Penarc (talk) 00:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks! I'll keep that in mind in future. --SelfieCity (talk|contributions) 16:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)